Disciplinary panel established after allegations brought against Peterborough City Council legal executive

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
The panel was re-formed after legal executive Rochelle Tapping questioned its validity

A disciplinary panel was re-established at a Peterborough City Council (PCC) meeting on Thursday (31st August) after its initial validity was questioned by one of the council’s top executives.

Rochelle Tapping, PCC’s Director of Legal and Governance, claims that the panel she was brought in front of last month was “illegitimately constituted”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

This is because its members weren’t officially named at its original establishment at another council meeting in July, which she says protocol requires.

Peterborough City CouncilPeterborough City Council
Peterborough City Council

PCC disputes this, saying their legal advice suggests that the panel was legitimate, but agreed to ratify it at a second council meeting regardless “for the avoidance of doubt”.

Read More
Top Peterborough City Council legal executive claims disciplinary process brough...

The exact nature of the allegations brought against Ms Tapping is not publicly known.

Indeed, much of this week’s council meeting was held in private – away from the press and public – but attended by PCC councillors as well as government solicitor Simon Goacher from the Weightmans law firm and employment solicitor David Potter from the Freeths law firm.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Also in attendance were UNISON union representative Sharon Bishop and Maxine McFarlane, Ms Tapping’s mother.

What we do know is that the independent panel was re-established at the meeting alongside a second disciplinary panel; the reason for this is included in council documents.

They state that protocol means that an investigation and disciplinary panel, made up of councillors, must be set up to pass relevant matters on to the second, independent panel, which can then review the evidence and begin dismissal procedures where appropriate.

The members of this second panel have now been named as Grant Osbourn, Stuart Webster and Mike Sofianos.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

This group has already met, on 14th August, to discuss the disciplinary issue, but this is the meeting Ms Tapping says was illegitimate based on the legal advice she’s received.

Independent persons are typically paid £1,000 per year for carrying out the role, while the chair of the panel made up of councillors is paid upwards of £3,000.

Ms Tapping's role, one of the most senior at the council, comes with an £100,000+ pay packet and involves advising PCC on the legality of its decisions and offering guidance to elected councillors.

The outcome of the disciplinary process brought against her remains to be seen.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.